feliciakw: (SPN - LR (4.01))
I've been asked, in spite of the late date, to do my weekly magnum opus of SPN review. So, if there's still an interest, I'll try to do it tomorrow, after work, before Show.

However, I can pretty much tell you that everything I'm gonna say is already floating around out there in other people's meta. You'll have to trust me, I guess, when I say that I thought a lot of the same things, independent of reading other people's meta. I liked the ep lots, was actually kinda impressed with the guest character and could have seen him return on a semi-recurring basis. I believed the circumstances under which the character was introduced, and the character provided for a lot of insight into the Winchester brothers. I didn't pick up on what the MotW was (props to [livejournal.com profile] kalquessa for her questionable knowledge *eyebrow quirk* of such icky things.

So let me know. You wanna wade through my thoughts, or what? I won't be offended if you're like, "Eh, it's been a week. I'm tired of reading about it. Let's proceed forward." Neither will I be offended by "WT??? Of course I MUST know what you thought of this phenomenal and groundbreaking ep! It's FIC, for cryin' out loud! And it WORKS!!! Can't you SEE that????"

Right. So. I'm good either way. Just lacking energy right now. Maybe dinner and CSI (from last week, of course) will help in that regard.
feliciakw: (Say What?)
So . . . is this another change in internet networking trends?

First, it was a mailing list (angus, I think). And I was happy there.

Then, it was YahooGroups. And that was good, too. Particularly since I could read it as a message board without having it come to my e-mail if I wanted.

Then it was LJ, and things became less centralized and more spread out and not so easily accessible, but I can record my own thoughts and activities, but still . . . not as focused . . .

Now there's talk of the Dreamwidth thing. Are people jumping ship from LJ for the next trend?

I mean, I'm already on Facebook (mostly for family), and [livejournal.com profile] whitemartyr caught me on a low day and utched me into joining Twitter. I don't need one more place I'm not gonna keep up with . . .

Btw, I'd still be interested in an easy way to download or save my LJ to my computer. Any suggestions?
feliciakw: (SPN)
ITunes is once again impressive, as I'm downloading last night's ep right now, before 7am. Wow!

So. Last night's ep. So . . . what happened to the case the Boys were actually investigating before they got sidetracked with the events of the ep?

TIH Trivia

Feb. 20th, 2009 07:20 pm
feliciakw: (Say What?)
Dudes! Geo pointed out to me, and I did a quick re-watch, and there are Kroger labels in the grocery store!

Now, for those of you who have no idea what I'm talking about, Kroger is a Cincinnati-based grocery store chain. Ralph's in L.A. is part of the same corporation.

So what was Kroger stuff doing in CA? Who on the crew is an Ohioan? Inquiring minds are inquiring.
feliciakw: (Family)
[livejournal.com profile] kalquessa is doing the Five Things meme, and I commented, and here's what she said she wanted me to nanner on about:

Stage acting, widescreen, Jensen, A/V geekery, and dancing )

So. Anything else anyone want to know?

Question:

Feb. 4th, 2009 08:38 pm
feliciakw: (SPN - LR (4.01))
What does it mean when a fandom is reduced to wailing "Oh, boys," flailing and/or flappy hands, then hugging said boys and never letting go?

Just curious . . .
feliciakw: (Default)
Well, thanks to a heads-up from Kimmer (and her generosity in burning me a copy off her DVR), it looks like I'll be able to do an ep review for 4.12.

If anyone is interested.

I realize that it will be over a week late, and what with all the meta floating around, I completely understand y'all aren't interested anymore.

But if you are, let me know, and I'll go ahead and get it done.

Yay! Thanks, Kimmer!
feliciakw: (Say What?)
I've seen in several places recently a reference of Dean's fear of rats. And for the life of me, I can't figure out where this notion comes from. I assume I'm missing some canon point of trivia, so if anyone can point me to the appropriate episode and scene to answer the question, I'd appreciate it.

SPN trivia

Sep. 6th, 2008 12:44 pm
feliciakw: (Gun & claw)
I know that this has probably been a point of discussion at some point, but I consciously noticed it today, and I found it interesting . . .

In "Sin City," Sam claims the bed closest to the door. Actually, Dean enters the room first and goes directly to the bed farthest away from the door. Is this the first time we've seen Sam take the "protector's" bed, so to speak? Or have we seen this earlier? I believe (though I'll have to keep track) that this is a continuing trend throughout the season. (I'm certain that in Mal Mal, Sam takes the protector's bed).

Veddy interestink . . . and not surprising considering the turn the story has taken at this point.
feliciakw: (Say What?)
NOTE: PLEASE DO NOT INCLUDE ACTUAL SPOILERS IN YOUR RESPONSE. I cannot stress this strongly enough. I am trying to remain as spoiler-free as possible (without completely leaving the Internet) until September 18. (Note to self: Stay away from TVGuide.com.) Here's my question:

For those of you who live for spoilers, who go hunting them down, who read the sides, who grasp at any and every spoiler as if it is a life preserver . . .

Has knowing the surprises and twists and turns and reveals of a show ever really enhanced your enjoyment of it?

The reason I ask is this: I've been watching YouTube vids of yesterday's SPN panel at SDCC. For the most part, I feel I came away minimally spoiled (yay!). Much of what was mentioned I read weeks ago (and promptly stopped reading spoilers), and some of it (like a guest casting mention and episode plot) was more like "coming attractions" than actual "spoilers." However, in one person's question, I learned something that doesn't really surprise me, but now I've lost the "Oh! Of course! That's awesome!" that I would have otherwise had when watching the season opener. Now this particular piece of information might not even be considered a spoiler to some folks. But I, now knowing to expect this piece of information, will miss out on the nifty-neato coolness of discovering it for myself (amidst all the angst).

So my question is . . . do you really enjoy the show more when you know what's going to happen? Do you worry for no reason when rumors or publicity prove to be misleading? Do you cope better with big reveals that disappoint when you know them ahead of time?

Because me? Half the fun of SPN is not knowing what's going to happen next. (Granted, this is a double edged sword, as not knowing also contributes to much viewer anxiety in the midst of the story arc. Of course, previous betrayals by various shows contributes to that, but I digress . . .) Some things I'm not surprised by, even if I'm not spoiled for them. (Dean's circumstances at the end of S3, for example. No surprise. Otoh, Don and Charlie's circumstances at the end of N3 last season? HUGE surprise. I was closer to tears for that one than for SPN, precisely because I did not see it coming.) But I would have been VASTLY disappointed if I'd been spoiled for the twist in "Mystery Spot," for example. Or if I'd known how S1 ended.

So I'm curious. If it does enhance the show, how so? If it doesn't, why do you spoil yourself?

Inquiring minds want to know.

Profile

feliciakw: (Default)
feliciakw

January 2020

S M T W T F S
    1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 2nd, 2025 07:19 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios