Do we need a secondary venue?
Jul. 31st, 2011 09:17 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
With the wonkiness of LJ in the past week, a lot of us have been really frustrated with not being able to post, to communicate with one another, to contact peeps we only contact through LJ.
It seems a viable alternative might be prudent.
I know several of my LJ peeps really have no interest in Dreamwidth. I've also seen it indicated that DW users don't want DW to be inundated by LJ users.
It occurs to me that there is another alternative.
Long before I was talked into joining LJ, I was active on a number of Yahoo Groups. For those unfamiliar with YahooGroups, they act in a very similar manner to an LJ comm. I'm not sure about posting vids, and photos are posted in a photo folder available to the group.
Groups can be open or moderated, membership required or not. I spent many, MANY hours on my YahooGroups list. Too many. It's simple, convenient, and serves most of the purposes we use LJ for.
If anyone is interested, let me know. Perhaps a couple of us could start a group and co-mod or something.
It seems a viable alternative might be prudent.
I know several of my LJ peeps really have no interest in Dreamwidth. I've also seen it indicated that DW users don't want DW to be inundated by LJ users.
It occurs to me that there is another alternative.
Long before I was talked into joining LJ, I was active on a number of Yahoo Groups. For those unfamiliar with YahooGroups, they act in a very similar manner to an LJ comm. I'm not sure about posting vids, and photos are posted in a photo folder available to the group.
Groups can be open or moderated, membership required or not. I spent many, MANY hours on my YahooGroups list. Too many. It's simple, convenient, and serves most of the purposes we use LJ for.
If anyone is interested, let me know. Perhaps a couple of us could start a group and co-mod or something.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 02:01 pm (UTC)The elitist DW users who don't want us unwashed LJ-ers over there can seriously go scratch.
I was a member of several Yahoo groups about 6-7 years ago. I find it VERY annoying to use. Cluttered and difficult to keep up with. From my POV Dreamwidth is a much better option.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 11:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 02:52 pm (UTC)But as I am not quite as fandom-active (or LJ-active, really) at the moment, my opinion may not be very useful to you. Mostly, I just balk at the idea of adding YET ANOTHER social media type site to my already overloaded internet brain. I can barely remember to back up my LJ, much less copy it over somewhere every time I post, or multi-post things. And I tend to always wonder who I'm going to leave behind when/if I move to new social media....
(I need to make a post about this, perhaps.)
no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 04:03 pm (UTC)This.
People keep prodding me to join Facebook and/or Twitter, and while I do have a little bit of curiosity about the whole thing, it's just...too much. I think I'm OK with DW because I'm viewing it as an adjunct to LJ, sort of like checking my Friends page, and then opening someone's post to read more. DW's basically just a backup plan for me right now.
I was very present with the Yahoo groups when I was doing my Planet of the Apes fic about 6-7 years ago, but it was very...messy. People didn't seem to have a handle on how to reply to a post, so I would have to wade through a lot of copied material and weird codes to find someone's 5-word comment. LJ is much, much cleaner (and has more pictures).
Really, I think the problem is that LJ just got way too big for its britches. They keep trying to add new stuff that people mostly hate, and because it's gigantic and very visible, it's an obvious target for people with political grudges. I'm guessing that what DW is now, LJ used to be, back in the day. So I definitely lean in that direction.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 04:19 pm (UTC)I really don't get what all the fuss is about. For starters, it's not lj's fault that a group of idiots decided to ruin things for everyone. I mean, when hasn't that happened on the internet? Lj is not alone in that capacity. And secondly, the site didn't just go down for no reason--they were attacked because they were providing people a place to speak freely when they were otherwise denied the ability to do so. Call me crazy, but I can deal with it going down for a few days if that is indeed the reason why.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 05:31 pm (UTC)No, I don't think it's LJ's "fault," but I've always been of the opinion that if you make yourself visible, you're more likely to get whacked. This particular outage is what, more than a week old now? How much longer until we can post something that's more than a few hundred words long? I got tired of waiting, so I shifted over to DW, which allows me to do what I want to do. I'm paying for both accounts, so I don't feel like I'm doing anything wrong. We had a major highway/bridge closure here for a couple of weeks, and I didn't stop going to work because my normal route was closed - I found another route. Same deal here.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 06:28 pm (UTC)Personally I love the interactivity that lj provides, the communities, the nested comments. And as someone who has been on lj for over ten years I've been witness to the whole "something breaks, everybody freaks out" cycle a few times now.(And, really, what form of social media HASN'T screwed the pooch in the past year? Facebook is constantly encroaching on user privacy, twitter fail whales at least once a week.) All I can say is do what makes you happy. But in response to
no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 08:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 08:31 pm (UTC)But yeah. Everybody's got their preferences. :)
no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 10:56 pm (UTC)I am not alone!
no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 05:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 05:34 pm (UTC)If your journal is relatively small, you can mirror the whole thing over at DW. A few flisties have done that, and I tried it, but I've got way too much material. Basically got an error message saying "Whoa! Whoa! Too much!" and there's no way to tell it, "Just copy *these* posts." But yours is much less extensive than mine, so you could probably do it. It's like a 3-click process.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 08:14 pm (UTC)Very very simple. (At least the one that I've used.)
no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 08:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 11:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 10:50 pm (UTC)Yes, THIS.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 06:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 11:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-02 08:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-02 08:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 10:58 pm (UTC)I really don't think you should rule out DW as an option.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 11:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 11:35 pm (UTC)I'm puzzled that you thought there wasn't a free option.
no subject
Date: 2011-07-31 11:59 pm (UTC)I didn't know if there was an option to just go to DW and sign up like I did with LJ, where I created an account, selected an option, and voila.
no subject
Date: 2011-08-01 12:21 am (UTC)There's also a comm on DW which is specifically for people looking for invite codes, or looking to give them away. So it really is not hard to get them! The main purpose of invite codes, IMHO, is to keep out spambots.