Oh, I totally agree. He's professional, and positive, and knows when and how to present himself. But that's kind of my point: he doesn't say anything until after the fact. So if he's expressing reservations about how something was written, it's in the past, and he's moved on.
I haven't read the entire article, because I don't want to be spoiled, but just the portion I read, it sounded like his chagrin was from the beginning of the season. Jared said Jensen played it well and kept it true to character. It's all stated in the past tense, which makes me think that everyone is reading something into this that might not still be there.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2010-10-05 03:09 am (UTC)I haven't read the entire article, because I don't want to be spoiled, but just the portion I read, it sounded like his chagrin was from the beginning of the season. Jared said Jensen played it well and kept it true to character. It's all stated in the past tense, which makes me think that everyone is reading something into this that might not still be there.
Does that make sense?