RE: your first paragraph . . . I'm extrapolating. Kripke wrote Anna as saying that angels were pretty, pretty, cold statues--or whatever her line was (except that she could give herself a spleen-ectomy--thus choosing to disobey . . . which means to obey is also a free will choice . . . which negates Anna's argument that there's no free will in Heaven). Then Kripke wrote Dean as choosing pain and guilt over a Stepford bitch in Paradise existence. And Cas says nothing to correct that perception. (Though I think Cas is still getting the hang of the discernment thing.) Both, in essence, are saying the same thing. Both are written by Kripke. If he has to pay attention to consistency, does it have to be that particular plot device?
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2009-05-19 09:52 pm (UTC)