That's the thing - challenging and Jensen always said he likes challenge. I can see him missing that dynamics but otoh playing the same dynamics for 6 years? It bores you no matter how much thought you put in it.
I feel like I'm not explaining myself and how I'm understanding Jensen's words very well, and that we've lost the point of the original conversation. We obviously see things very differently, and understand his words differently. I'm not sure if you understand where I'm coming from, or if you simply don't agree. Either way, I think we've probably come to the end of the conversation as to what Jensen meant when he gave that interview. We each can only see and perceive his words through our own understanding, which is different. I've said all I can say, explained my thoughts and point of view to the best of my ability, and saying anything more would just be repeating what I've already said.
It doesn't really matter anyway.
In the future, I think I'll try to refrain from sharing my insight and interpretation of what Jensen says about such "controversial" things unless specifically asked.
As for the soulless storyline, I don't see it being illogically written. Rather, we continue to have information given to us that requires us to re-think what's come before.
Sam feels when it fits the story and doesn't feel when it fits the story
That's not really how I see it. Rather, the more we learn, the more we discover that Sam has been acting, displaying the feelings he knows are expected, but not really feeling them. Like in the season opener, he really looked like he cared about Lisa and Ben, if for no other reason than Dean cared about Lisa and Ben. Now we know that he doesn't, which means he was acting. That's not a contradiction; that's additional information revealed to us.
And actually, these reveals are in keeping with how I've been reading things since the beginning of the season.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
no subject
Date: 2010-11-15 03:15 am (UTC)I feel like I'm not explaining myself and how I'm understanding Jensen's words very well, and that we've lost the point of the original conversation. We obviously see things very differently, and understand his words differently. I'm not sure if you understand where I'm coming from, or if you simply don't agree. Either way, I think we've probably come to the end of the conversation as to what Jensen meant when he gave that interview. We each can only see and perceive his words through our own understanding, which is different. I've said all I can say, explained my thoughts and point of view to the best of my ability, and saying anything more would just be repeating what I've already said.
It doesn't really matter anyway.
In the future, I think I'll try to refrain from sharing my insight and interpretation of what Jensen says about such "controversial" things unless specifically asked.
As for the soulless storyline, I don't see it being illogically written. Rather, we continue to have information given to us that requires us to re-think what's come before.
Sam feels when it fits the story and doesn't feel when it fits the story
That's not really how I see it. Rather, the more we learn, the more we discover that Sam has been acting, displaying the feelings he knows are expected, but not really feeling them. Like in the season opener, he really looked like he cared about Lisa and Ben, if for no other reason than Dean cared about Lisa and Ben. Now we know that he doesn't, which means he was acting. That's not a contradiction; that's additional information revealed to us.
And actually, these reveals are in keeping with how I've been reading things since the beginning of the season.