SPN - 8.21 - The Great Escapist
I don't have a whole lot to say about this one right now. It seemed disjointed or uneven or something.
Plus their angel lore and storyline annoys me mightily.
While Sam's recollection of the Grand Canyon was funny, I'm perturbed that they made it the Grand Canyon. As those of us who've been with the show from the beginning know, one of Dean's most heartfelt speeches involves his declaration of a desire to go to the Grand Canyon because they've never been there before (specifically, so they could lay low while Dean figured out a way to save Sam, but still).
However, I was amused at the sameness of Biggerson's across the country. Apparently, Biggerson's it the IHOP of the SPN universe. (Reference one of Geo's favorite lines from Honky Tonk Freeway.)
Sam being "cleansed" is a interesting idea. Of course this makes me wonder if next year's arc is going to be Dean going dark side. That idea doesn't sit well with me.
But curing a demon? How do you restore humanity to a spirit that's had the humanity burned out of it?
Did anyone else recognize Metatron from Moonlighting? He played Herbert Viola back in the day.
Yay that Kevin is still alive! And very good that Metatron stepped up to the plate and saved him.
Other than that, I don't think I really have an opinion on this ep. I just really don't like the characterization of angels they've got going.
Bleh.
ETA: Ben Edlund wrote this one? I'm surprised and disappointed that I didn't like this one better than I did. (And since Edlund was around for the aforementioned Grand Canyon speech, it sounds like I'm going to have to figure out some way to handwave the incongruity.)
no subject
The whole Metatron story was basically sidelined.
So yeah, I was just a little bored. There were parts that I really loved.
I too was annoyed about the Grand Canyon thing. Ugh. like, really Edlund??
no subject
no subject
It does seem to have more plot potential, though, than, say, Dean's sudden allergy to cats, which he's apparently always had, except he's never had it before. Bzuh?
no subject
(Sam's "Special K" line was a give-away, too. Just in case we missed it.)
And finding out that Kevin was playing Crowley was pretty cool.
I hope we get something interesting from the angel tablet storyline, though, because right now, Naomi does nothing but twirl her metaphorical mustache, make threats, and show her disdain for humanity. I have no use for her right now.
no subject
no subject
no subject
I wasn't an XF viewer when it was in first run, though I have seen the whole thing on DVD. I think for me the comparison would be Stargate SG-1. It ran for five years on Showtime (I think), then got picked up by Sci-Fi Channel (the year Daniel was dead). Richard Dean Anderson left after S8 (iirc), and they could have ended it there. They ran for an additional 2 years (10 season in all), and while the new characters were fine, the new villain was . . . bothersome. I didn't find the last two seasons as engaging as the previous (especially early) seasons. And I don't find the follow-up movies at all memorable.
I'll stick with Show to the end, but they seem to be running out of fresh ideas, or perhaps it's that the execution isn't what it once was. There are certainly new elements I've enjoyed (the Men of Letters lair, for example), but these Trials Three just isn't as engaging and mysterious as, say, the psy-kids of seasons past. You know?
no subject
no subject
And that fear kicked in strongly with me with SPN back in S2 with YED and the Cold Oak thing. Then we came to S4 and S5 (particularly the second half of S4), and it started distancing me from the mytharc. I still found (and find) the characters engaging, but I haven't been truly engaged in the shows mytharc for a long time. I think there are a lot of elements that go into this feeling (disgruntlement with the depiction of angels, disappointment that Dean often seems to serve no real pro-active central purpose anymore, etc.).
I'd like a way for the writers to keep it fresh and interesting without ignoring/changing or conversely leaning to heavily on what has come before.
It's a balancing act, to be sure.
no subject