ext_50198 ([identity profile] feliciakw.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] feliciakw 2008-07-29 01:54 pm (UTC)

I totally see where you're coming from on a lot of these. Yeah, to be 100% spoiler free you do have to live in a cave. And TVGuide blurbs are (usually) fair game for me (TVGuide articles and interviews are a little more problematic). Even if I don't want to be spoiled, I can't help reading the synopsis of upcoming eps. Those create more what I'd call anticipatory squee than actual spoilerage. That's "coming attractions" and holds a squee factor of its own.

And knowing general story arcs for the upcoming season (John and Mary as teens, solving the mystery of how Dean gets out of Hell--which I think is a mystery because the *writers* haven't figured it out yet) isn't really that big a deal, and not something that can really be avoided unless you do move into a cave. But knowing a blow-by-blow of what's gonna happen? Like with sides and stuff? That puzzles me. Because while a good story might be a good story regardless of whether you know about it or not, your first experience at discovering the story as a viewer isn't as it's intended to be experienced. Does that make sense?

And one of the things that really bugs me (and I'm not accusing anyone in this conversation--though you, Carol, are a temptress) is people who don't care, or who--worse yet--purposely spoil things. Because they take away that joy of experience for someone new. I confess to accidentally spoiling some people for some things, but I've also been told that I'm really good at saying a lot without actually saying anything when it comes to squee vs. spoilerage.

Yeah, it is interesting what different people consider spoilers, isn't it? :-)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting